Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-01-24 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:54:53 -0800
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDRUVq4gdKERu=0i2T1sAwUS2nw3nNeebAL7soWh_vMJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> The fact that "background-position: 10%;" and "background-position: calc(10%);" can result in differ renderings is perhaps unfortunate, but required by the specs as I read them.

Yes, it's currently required by the specs.  I've stated this several
times.  This is why I'm proposing to *change* the specs here, to match
what Gecko currently does.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 18:55:42 UTC