- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:15:11 +0000
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- CC: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
... and (in prefixed form) in <image> radial gradients in IE10 previews. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sylvain Galineau [mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com] > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:42 PM > To: L. David Baron; Aryeh Gregor > Cc: Lea Verou; www-style list > Subject: RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is > duplicated or points to the wrong spec > > > [L. David Baron:] > > > > On Monday 2012-01-23 12:32 -0500, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > In any case, we are way offtopic. :) If you disagree with the > > > > background-position syntax, please start a new thread about it > > > > (tagged with [css3-background] or [css4-background]) > > > > > > I don't think we should change background-position syntax, if > that's > > > what browsers implement already. I do think we shouldn't copy it > to > > > transform-origin, given that browsers haven't implemented it yet. > > > > Gecko's started implementing the new background-position syntax; I > don't > > know if anybody else has. > > Support for it shipped in IE9.
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 06:15:54 UTC