W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

[css3-text] Should text-shadow have 'spread'?

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:26:25 -0800
Message-id: <6F732F6B-8FE9-4376-8B3E-F02CDCB9C093@me.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
I don't think 'spread' should apply to text-shadow, yet CSS3 Text suggests that text-shadow follows box-shadow <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-shadow>.

For rectangles and rounded-corner rectangles, 'spread' is easy to implement by insetting or outsetting the rectangle bounds. For arbitrary shapes, spread is vastly more difficult to implement, requiring either some complex path math, or pixel-based computations that are expensive to do at drawing time. There are also complexities related to whether spread makes sharp corners rounded etc.

Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 19:27:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:10 UTC