- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:55:58 -0800
- To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org, ACJ <ego@acjs.net>
2012/1/19 Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>: > 19.01.2012, 21:44, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>: >> This could also be addressed by something like: >> >> background-image-4: url(whatever.png); >> >> That seems somewhat easier to read - it's difficult to tell off-hand >> what layer is being referenced in your example. > > Just thoughts: maybe background-image[4] (looks more array-like)? That's not allowed by the grammar currently, though by the error-recovery rules it would fail nicely (it'll eat content until the next ";" or "}", like any malformed declaration). I agree that it looks a little better. My concern is that it looks a bit more like mutating, rather than a separate property, so the fact that it works within the normal cascade system might be confusing. > Is there a draft for accessing individual items of CSS enumerations such as in multiple bg-layers case? No. It's been an off-and-on topic for some time, and is now coming back into discussion. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 17:56:49 UTC