- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:11:11 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/11/2011 09:33 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#border-image-slice says: > #<number> > # Numbers represent pixels in the image (if the image is a > # raster image) or vector coordinates (if the image is a > # vector image). > > I'm not sure what "vector coordinates" are, for example in the case > of SVG. I'm guessing that for SVG with a viewBox or with an > intrinsic size, this means that the image is drawn at its intrinsic > size and these "vector coordinates" are coordinates in the viewport > coordinate system. (But if it has both a viewBox and height/width > attributes on the root, which win? Is it CSS pixels on the root's > container, or the viewport coordinate system?) It might be good to > clarify that, though. > > But what happens if the SVG doesn't have an intrinsic size or > doesn't have a viewBox? What size is the SVG drawn at in order to > determine the slices? I've added the following text: | If the image must be sized to determine the slices (for example, | for SVG images with no intrinsic size), then it is sized as for an | auto-sized background, using the border image area as the default | object size in place of the background positioning area. Does that seem all right to you? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 04:11:53 UTC