- From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:00:06 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, www-style@w3.org
2012/1/17 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>: > 2012/1/17 Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>: >> It's wrong and harmful to try think for web-developers and invent artificial unusable limitations as a result. Web-developers themselves are capable to decide how to use syntax. Imports/includes in PHP, SSI, etc., are possible at any place, and this is not an issue there. > > Incorrect. We must always guard against making the language too > complicated when the reward is just better behavior in an edge case. Why is this “making the language more complicated” or an “edge case”. I still remember the large amount of time I spent recently debugging and wondering why my style sheet didn’t work until I remembered this bizarre rule. I would say the current behaviour, not the proposed revision, is the rule that is making the CSS language “more complicated”. -- cheers, -ambrose
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 21:00:42 UTC