- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:10:12 -0500
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>
> From: John Daggett [mailto:jdaggett@mozilla.com] > Koji Ishii wrote: > > The Writing Modes module defines two things: > > 1. The default orientation of each code point > > 2. How authors can change its default orientation by applying styles > > We’re trying to solve 2 nd issue in CSS Writing Modes, and 1 st issue > > in Unicode. > > I agree this is the right approach. However, as written, this is not what the current editor's > draft defines, as noted previously it's using a combination of per-script definitions > (Appendix B) and UTR50 for the common/inherited/unknown case. Hmm...our spec is still going on and UTR#50 is still going on, so I'm hoping to resolve them in the end. I can't speak for Elika but I'm feeling some uncertainness of UTR#50 process, as some of our feedbacks such as orientation for Egyptian and Yi[1] were not taken seriously and were simply ignored in the 2nd draft. I don't know what we should do if UTR#50 didn't incorporate our feedbacks and defined something we believe incorrect. We have two more weeks until UTR#50 feedback deadline and I'm willing to do my best to make our feedbacks incorporated. If it turned out to be the case, we need to discuss. I hope not, and it's not too late to start discussion after that, right? [1] http://www.unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=222 Regards, Koji
Received on Monday, 16 January 2012 15:13:07 UTC