- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:24:56 +0000
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Christoph Päper [mailto:christoph.paeper@crissov.de] ± Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 4:07 AM ± ± Maybe Regions could do it with few additions: ± ± p { ± position: relative; ± padding-right: 20em; ± flow-flush: figures; /* force display of figures that came earlier */ ± } ± figure { ± flow-into: figures; ± } ± p::after { ± flow-from: figures; ± position: absolute; top: 0; right: 0; ± width: 18em; ± } ± It's an interesting idea. The concept of "flow-flush" however doesn't work naturally with named flows. Once something is in a named flow, comparing its source order with something outside of named flow may or may not make sense. It might work, but I would be very careful planning for that. **if** that worked (or if each figure used a unique flow name), you could in fact do something like this (and you don't need absolute positioning): p#caption42 { flow-from: figure42; float:right; } #figure42 { flow-into: figure42; } Alex
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 21:58:38 UTC