- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:24:56 +0000
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Christoph Päper [mailto:christoph.paeper@crissov.de]
± Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 4:07 AM
±
± Maybe Regions could do it with few additions:
±
± p {
± position: relative;
± padding-right: 20em;
± flow-flush: figures; /* force display of figures that came earlier */
± }
± figure {
± flow-into: figures;
± }
± p::after {
± flow-from: figures;
± position: absolute; top: 0; right: 0;
± width: 18em;
± }
±
It's an interesting idea. The concept of "flow-flush" however doesn't work naturally with named flows. Once something is in a named flow, comparing its source order with something outside of named flow may or may not make sense. It might work, but I would be very careful planning for that.
**if** that worked (or if each figure used a unique flow name), you could in fact do something like this (and you don't need absolute positioning):
p#caption42 {
flow-from: figure42;
float:right;
}
#figure42 {
flow-into: figure42;
}
Alex
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 21:58:38 UTC