- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:14:28 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Alex Mogilevsky: > I think what you want is to align with element by ID or selector. Certainly not by ID, but by selector might work. > "Align with top of previous element" seems way too specific for this purpose and pretty complicated to define, so my bet is alignment of random elements will happen sooner. If the new ‘float’ values from GCPM (esp. ‘top’ and ‘bottom’) get accepted, it’s not unreasonable to also have new values for ‘clear’ and it’s also not unreasonable to float (or clear) horizontally and vertically at the same time. > Meanwhile, if the markup had such related elements grouped together, … (which I don't think is unreasonable, it is semantic), It’s either inappropriate or impossible in the cases I’m thinking about.
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 11:15:03 UTC