- From: Max Vujovic <mvujovic@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:20:34 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Boris, Thanks for the feedback! >> The CSS 2.1 spec states that min-width and max-width are undefined on >> tables. > Note that the same is true for 'width' except for fixed layout mode... That's a good point to note. Looking at it again, the spec gives suggested methods to compute it but does not impose requirements. >> What do you all think? Does implementing min-width and max-width on the >> table tag in WebKit sound reasonable? > It sounds reasonable; you just can't rely on the spec to define how it > should behave, because no one really has that figured out yet. It's > _possible_ that Presto and Gecko are compatible here, of course. I > wouldn't bet on it. That makes sense. From my preliminary tests, Presto and Gecko have been compatible, but I'll try some more complex cases to uncover any differences. - Max ________________________________________ From: Boris Zbarsky [bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:43 AM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: min-width and max-width on <table> On 1/6/12 6:44 PM, Max Vujovic wrote: > The CSS 2.1 spec states that min-width and max-width are undefined on > tables. Note that the same is true for 'width' except for fixed layout mode... > What do you all think? Does implementing min-width and max-width on the > table tag in WebKit sound reasonable? It sounds reasonable; you just can't rely on the spec to define how it should behave, because no one really has that figured out yet. It's _possible_ that Presto and Gecko are compatible here, of course. I wouldn't bet on it. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 22:21:17 UTC