- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:30:40 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/1/12 04:00, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Doctype switching isn't really a "useful" property. We employed it as > a last resort to help with compat in the bad old days of IE > domination, when there was a major irreconcilable difference between > what IE did and what the specs wanted. If the modern WG was > transported back to that time we probably wouldn't have done it - more > likely, we'd have adopted IE's box model and added the box-sizing > property earlier. Similarly, here, if we find parts of text layout > that we want to change, we'll just add properties to allow changing > it. If it ends up being unfixable, we can make a new layout mode that > does things right. There's no reason to reach for the nuclear option > of a version switch. ~TJ I think you’re underestimating the number of compromises we've had to do over the years for backwards compatibility. I can't count the number of times I've read "that would be a good idea, but would break existing websites" in www-style threads. -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 16:31:24 UTC