- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:38:28 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/01/2012 21:03, Simon Sapin wrote: > Le 08/01/2012 20:48, Anton Prowse a écrit : >> On 30/11/2011 18:29, Simon Sapin wrote: >>> Le 30/11/2011 18:15, Simon Sapin a écrit : >>>> In CSS 2.1, the computed value of the 'content' property is defined as: >>>> >>>> """ >>>> On elements, always computes to 'normal'. On :before and :after, if >>>> 'normal' is specified, computes to 'none'. Otherwise, for URI values, >>>> the absolute URI; for attr() values, the resulting string; for other >>>> keywords, as specified. >>>> """ >>> >>> Also, replace "for other keywords, as specified" by "for other values, >>> as specified": values other than URIs and attr() are not all keywords, >>> they may be strings or counters. >> >> Simon, this is being tracked at >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15458 >> >> Cheers, >> Anton Prowse >> http://dev.moonhenge.net >> > > Great, thanks. > > I replied in Bugzilla. When an issue has an entry in Bugzilla, should > discussion go there, on the list, or both? On the list, please. That way we don't fragment the conversation. I think that the bug tracker works best for concise summaries of the on-list discussion. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Sunday, 8 January 2012 20:41:28 UTC