- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:56:30 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 29/11/2011 17:45, fantasai wrote: > At TPAC we resolved to clarify CSS2.1 to say that the > 'page-break-before' and > 'page-break-after' properties don't create a break if you're at the top > of the > page, where at the top of the page means no content has been placed, with > borders not counting as content but empty zero-height blocks counting as > content. > Here's my proposed text: > > Section 13.3.3 Allowed Page Breaks > > # In the normal flow, page breaks can occur at the following places: > # > # 1. In the vertical margin between block-level boxes. [...] > > This, interpreted strictly, indicates that a break is allowed between > siblings, > but not between a parent and its first or last child. Let's clarify that by > inserting "sibling" after "between". > > # Rule A: Breaking at (1) is allowed only if the 'page-break-after' and > # 'page-break-before' properties of all the elements generating boxes that > # meet at this margin allow it, which is when at least one of them has the > # value 'always', 'left', or 'right', or when all of them are 'auto'. > > The phrase "meet at this margin" is ill-defined, so we need to define it: > > | A box meets at this margin if it is one of the block-level siblings on > | either side of the margin or if it is a block-level last (for boxes > | before the margin) or first (for boxes after the margin) child of a box > | that also meets at this margin. > > We should also add > > | For boxes before the margin, the 'page-break-after' value is considered; > | for boxes after the margin the 'page-break-before' value is considered. > > I think that should get us the behavior we want with the minimal amount of > changes to CSS2.1 and CSS3 Paged Media. For CSS Fragmentation, we can > consider > rewriting the section to describe the behavior in the terms Steve used. Fantasai, this bug is tracked at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15448 Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Sunday, 8 January 2012 11:59:27 UTC