- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 04:39:55 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, JonRimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Bjoern Hoehrmann:] > > * JonRimmer wrote: > >Wow, this seems very impressive. If you sign-up, they even have the > >ability to post via a web interface (attempting to use that to post this > reply). > > When I look at and attempt to use that "Nabble" interface, I am shocked > and horrified and can't really imagine anyone would use this to partici- > pate in www-style discussions for a prolonged period of time. As far as I > can tell, mail and netnews clients have always been much better than this. > The interaction required there to navigate through mails plus the load > times alone mean that I would have to spend over ten times as much time > reading mails as I do currently, and I am already writing my own client > because I find the client I currently use the most inefficient. I don't get it either. I don't know any designers who doesn't use email all the time. But then some folks don't get why I still prefer vim or emacs to 'modern IDEs' either. Not everyone likes their productivity in the same places.
Received on Sunday, 8 January 2012 04:57:01 UTC