- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:35:21 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/05/2012 03:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> Tab Atkins wrote: >>> If so, this seems suboptimal, as it's then impossible to, say, use >>> calc() to set the word-spacing to a particular length. (I had >>> expected "calc(0% + 1ch)" to kinda work like that.) Perhaps we can >>> alter word-spacing to accept both a percentage and a length, and >>> combine their effects? >> >> word-spacing takes up to three values, so that wouldn't be parseable. > > Oh, darn, I missed that. Is it possible to change<spacing-limit> at > this point, perhaps to a grammar like [...] (We don't, generally, add keywords for the sub-parts of multi-value properties, in case you haven't noticed. :) Alternatively, I could change percentages to be additive, too. It means word-spacing: -100%; would set the word spacing to zero, which is a little weird, but it would solve the problem you raise. What do you think? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 18:36:01 UTC