W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] New WIP CSS 2D Transforms tests

From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:04:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKA+AxmLtPKVnmpYMTEv61H1ECY_zHP-iQKo4y+-JstfiUatCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: www-style@w3.org, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Jet Villegas <jet@mozilla.com>
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> Currently CSSOM Views doesn't say whether getBoundingClientRect should
> include the effect of transforms, so technically you're depending on
> unspecified behavior. Gecko only very recently changed to match IE and
> Webkit by including the effect of transforms.

Yeah, that's a bug I filed:


For some reason, the .client* and .offset* properties do *not* reflect
the transformed box, but rather the untransformed one . . .

> Whoever's editing CSSOM Views
> should fix this by tightening that spec. Maybe it has no editor and you
> should do that :-).

Anne says he's no longer editing it.  I guess I could, if people
wanted.  Does this belong in CSSOM View or CSS 2D Transforms, though?
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 18:05:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:09 UTC