On 01/05/2012 11:58 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote: > Tab, > Apologies for a top post > > I do not see your problem. To me 150% is equivalent to 1.5ch. So, 1.5ch+150% is equivalent to 1.5ch+1.5ch. That is, both > values return a length and lengths add. Why do you think this does not make sense? It's not equivalent. 150% is 150% of the width of the affected word-spacing character. 1.5ch is 150% of the advance width of the '0' character. ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 6 January 2012 05:22:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:09 UTC