- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:15:47 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 22:16:35 UTC
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > > For consistency with other shorthand properties, flex-flow should accept > an > > unordered list of values and should allow either the flex-direction or > > flex-wrap value by itself. > > That seemed to be what Alex was asking for, too, so I'd put the > question to the thread earlier. I was keeping it consistent with the > old value until then. > > I've no problem with changing it, though. Fixed. The grammar is fixed, but this text still implies ordering "The value consists of one or two keywords: the first sets the orientation and direction of the flexbox's main axis, which affects the direction that flexbox items are laid out in, and the meaning of the ‘flex-pack’ properties; the second, if specified, marks the flexbox as being multi-line and sets the direction of the cross axis, which affects the direction new lines are stacked in, and the meaning of the ‘flex-align’ and ‘flex-line-pack’ properties."
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 22:16:35 UTC