- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:11:36 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] ± Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 1:58 PM ± ± On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: ± > For consistency with other shorthand properties, flex-flow should ± > accept an unordered list of values and should allow either the ± > flex-direction or flex-wrap value by itself. ± ± That seemed to be what Alex was asking for, too, so I'd put the question ± to the thread earlier. I was keeping it consistent with the old value ± until then. ± ± I've no problem with changing it, though. Fixed. I am not sure ordered was ever suggested, or maybe I missed that. I would do expect the shortcut property to take direction, wrap or both in any order - as most shortcut properties do. It seems we all agree on this, do we? Alex
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 22:12:10 UTC