- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:32:09 +0100
- To: mail@matthewwilcox.com
- CC: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 05/01/2012 14:27, Matthew Wilcox a écrit : > yes, you're right - however Orphans only applies to paged media. So is > there anything to stop the screen media implementation doing the > sensible thing and using the second definition (which is the only > definition relevent to screen)? I think this is a bad idea. No other CSS property (that I know of) change their meaning depending on the media type. (Besides being irrelevant/not applying.) Re-using the same property name will not make it happen faster anyway. Also, in print you may want both types of orphans, with a different number. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 13:32:43 UTC