- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:13:48 +1100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:30:11PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Widow is a CSS property from the CSS2 era, which is part of the “paged > media” specifications, it isn't relevant to screen media. Orphans are > a related concept that are, but have never been implemented in any > media. I propose that we do. > > An orphan is a singular word that drops to a new-line at the end of a > sentence. They're a typographic no-no and never happen in professional > print. I'm not sure that I've understood the above definition correctly, but my reading is that it describes the words "media", "sentence" and "print" in (the above-quoted portion of) your message. Is that the intent? I have come across more than one meaning of "orphan"[*1], but I don't think that's one of them. Regarding the proposed 'orphans' property, it looks as if you aren't familiar with http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/page.html#break-inside , which already assigns a different meaning to the 'orphans' property. (I would guess that more than one UA already implements the 'widows' and 'orphans' properties in essentially the sense given in this section.) I suggest that you read that section, and modify your proposal in light of that. pjrm. [*1]: See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widows_and_orphans .
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 13:14:13 UTC