- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:17:20 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:52:49 +0100, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > I saw that the orientation property was added to the spec > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-device-adapt/#orientation > > I have personally been against this when we discussed this in my team at > Nokia as it poses some big usability problems. It is highly confusing for > users if the browser automatically rotates when clicking on a link or > navigating session history. It is also confusing for the users when the > web > browser suddently doesn't want to rotate. We already had a lot of bug > reports due to users not understanding that some pages have pinch zoom > disabled so we are now considering always giving a minor feedback > animation > when pinch zoom is disabled. > > So I suggest that the properly should only be respected for stand-alone > web > apps or when in fullscreen (FullscreenAPI spec). But of course, doing > this > one way for Qt doesn't really matter if others do it differently :-) so I > was very interested in what others are thinking about this. I'm not opposed to adding a 'should' statement to the spec about this. The reason it was added in the first place was for widgets/web-apps/games, etc. -- Rune Lillesveen Layout Group Manager Core Technology Department Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 2 January 2012 15:17:56 UTC