- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:03:13 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 02/29/2012 12:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2012-02-29 11:43 -0800, fantasai wrote: >> On 02/29/2012 09:19 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:47 AM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/issues-lc-2012 >>>> >>>> ====== On element() ====== >>>> >>>> There's a ton of substantive issues on element(), particularly on the use of >>>> elements that are not in the document. Given: >>>> >>>> - the number of issues and their relative severity >>>> - the state of references to CSSElementMap >>> >>> The reference is informative. >> >> In that case it can be removed without changing the meaning of the spec, >> so let's do that and avoid the concerns about it. > > I object to doing so for the reasons stated in the last paragraph of > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html Those reasons don't apply anymore because the current ED doesn't define a "CSS element reference", it just uses an ID selector, whose behavior is well-defined. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 21:03:50 UTC