- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:28:05 -0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > (12/03/01 3:01), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Based on this discussion, I've made a few tweaks to the wording. I'm >> using the term "uniformly-scaled" in a few places, and better define >> the actual rendering of the gradient with the following paragraph: >> >> """ >> The color of the gradient at any point is determined by first finding >> the unique ellipse passing through that point with the same center and >> ratio between major and minor axises as the ending-shape. The point's >> color is then the color of the gradient ray at the point where this >> ellipse intersects it. >> """ >> >> Does this sound all right? >> > > You didn't mention that you add this too: > > # If the ending-shape is an ellipse, its axises are aligned with the > # horizontal and vertical axises. > > With this, it sounds good to me. Sorry, yeah, that too. The only other things I added to radial-gradient were either variants on the same language placed elsewhere, or a few other unimportant editorial tweaks. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 19:28:52 UTC