- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:59:57 -0800
- To: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com> wrote: >> I reviewed CSS3 Image Values and found no major issues. I did find some >> minor or editorial issues. Here is the first: >> >> Under 3.3 element(), in the sections labelled "Otherwise": >> >> | The function represents an image with width and height equal to the >> | bounding box of the referenced element. >> >> [plus several more mentions of "bounding box"] >> >> "Bounding box" is not defined in this spec or in CSS 2.1. In other >> contexts, the term "bounding box" often refers to the total painted >> area for an element, including shadows and overflow. I suspect >> "border box" is what is meant, since shadows and some border images are >> excluded. > > Yes, I did indeed mean "border box". Fixed and logged as issue 3. I've subsequently changed this usage over to "decorated bounding box", and defined what that means for CSS and SVG: <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#decorated-bounding-box> Is this an acceptable definition? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 00:00:44 UTC