- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:14:04 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Glazman > <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > 4. Normative references to WHATWG html > > -------------------------------------- > > > > Tab wants to make a normative reference from css3-images to the WHATWG > > html spec for paint sources. We should discuss it. The last 15 minutes > > of our call will be allocated to this. > > > > See thread starting at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html > > I'm not actually making a normative reference, though that wasn't > completely clear from the way I phrased things. I've rewritten that > paragraph into a note and made it clearer that the reference to HTML is > simply an example of how host languages can extend the set of things > element() matches against. Cool. This area is also at risk. > We can use this time for generic discussion about this issue, if you'd > like, but there's no pressing need. Agree. I do want to hear about where we are in terms of DoC, moving to CR etc. > If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs, which > we definitely refer to in some places. > > ~TJ >
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 22:14:38 UTC