- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:53:00 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > [Daniel Glazman:] > >> Le 28/02/12 01:06, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > >> > >> > No. I won't get into the differences between "never freezes" and > >> > "never stabilizes", but the HTMLWG version of the spec does not > >> > have CSSElementMap in it, so I'm actually *unable* to use it as a > >> > reference here. > >> > >> This is far more complex than just "B version has it and not A". > >> It's also a question of patent policy. It's a question of normatively > >> referencing a document having no patent policy, and sorry Tab, but > >> there won't be only engineers in the loop on that question, I'm > afraid... > >> > > I am afraid Daniel is right. While this may appear the quickest way to > > dispose of this comment it could also turn into the fastest route to > > an objection. Getting the issue fixed in the W3C version of HTML would > > be the preferred way to go. (Yes, I know, no fun). Or finding another > > way to resolve the issue. > > Are you planning to object to it? Are you aware of anyone else's plans to > object to it? > I know of members who care about normative requirements being covered by a patent policy, yes. And we are one of them.
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 15:54:13 UTC