Re: [css3-images] Referencing <svg> element directly with element()

On 2/27/12 7:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I'm not totally happy about leaving this undefined, but this spec
> *really* isn't the place to define it, and I'm not happy with simply
> disallowing this case in the spec, since there are definitely cases
> where there isn't any ambiguity.  For example, a disconnected
> <pattern>  that used nothing but attributes for styling would work just
> fine.

It wouldn't in Gecko, but that's ok.

> Is this acceptable?

I think so.


Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 04:59:16 UTC