W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-images] Referencing <svg> element directly with element()

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:58:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4C5F07.5060009@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
On 2/27/12 7:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I'm not totally happy about leaving this undefined, but this spec
> *really* isn't the place to define it, and I'm not happy with simply
> disallowing this case in the spec, since there are definitely cases
> where there isn't any ambiguity.  For example, a disconnected
> <pattern>  that used nothing but attributes for styling would work just
> fine.

It wouldn't in Gecko, but that's ok.

> Is this acceptable?

I think so.

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 04:59:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:12 UTC