- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:45:50 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 2/22/12 5:21 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: > Right. It can be done, but it would need disclaimers. Since it doesn't > bring much new information, as the same principle applies to em and rem, > I'd rather leave it out. But that's not a very strong preference, so if > a large number of people want it in, I can certainly add it. Maybe I should give some background. I've seen at least one bug report so far against Gecko (and a similar one claimed to be filed against Opera) because of the fact that in this one instance "rem" refers to the default size, not the root element size. It's not something web authors expect, and I think calling it out in an example would prevent a good bit of frustration in the future.... -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 13:46:20 UTC