W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: wading into the Prefix morass...

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:34:05 +0100
Message-Id: <FB6B42BA-1CB1-4367-902F-18E8203459B9@crissov.de>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
David Singer <singer@apple.com>:
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 6:02 , Christoph Päper wrote:
>> This is what implementers might be telling authors by use of prefixes:
>> -VND-
>> -pd- 
>> -ed- 
>> -wd- 
>>  may combine -pd-, -ed- and -wd- as -draft-.
>> -lc-  
>> -cr-  
>> -pr-  
>> -rec- 
>>  -cr-, -pr- and -rec- may be combined into -bugs-.
> I think this is overkill; features don't change nearly as often as this.

You are right. I just wanted to counter your proposal of a versioned ‘-draft-’ prefix. Personally I’m fine with vendor prefixes for internal and experimental use and a common ‘-draft-’ prefix during the testing and revising phase.

In an earlier mail I suggested that above prefixes would be used for comparison tests and perhaps by intranet developers. Only select ones would be used then.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 08:34:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:12 UTC