- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:34:05 +0100
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
David Singer <singer@apple.com>: > On Feb 21, 2012, at 6:02 , Christoph Päper wrote: > >> This is what implementers might be telling authors by use of prefixes: >> >> -VND- >> -pd- >> -ed- >> -wd- >> may combine -pd-, -ed- and -wd- as -draft-. >> -lc- >> -cr- >> -pr- >> -rec- >> -cr-, -pr- and -rec- may be combined into -bugs-. > > I think this is overkill; features don't change nearly as often as this. You are right. I just wanted to counter your proposal of a versioned ‘-draft-’ prefix. Personally I’m fine with vendor prefixes for internal and experimental use and a common ‘-draft-’ prefix during the testing and revising phase. In an earlier mail I suggested that above prefixes would be used for comparison tests and perhaps by intranet developers. Only select ones would be used then.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 08:34:44 UTC