- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:53:47 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-repeat lists the Computed Value of background-repeat as "as specified". Since the Computed Value line describes the information that the implementation must retain (or not) in the computed value (which is then inherited), this seems to imply that implementations must retain the distinction between "repeat" and "repeat repeat" while inheriting. This seems wrong; I don't think that distinction should be retained in the conceptual computed value. (However, when serializing, since implementations should prefer serializing a computed value to its longer-established form [1], both should get serialized as "repeat".) At least, based on my understanding of what the "Computed Value" line means, I think this should change. But I'm not sure how well my understanding is reflected in the relevant specifications. -David [1] In my opinion, this rule is more important than serializing to the shortest form. In this case, both lead to the same result. -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 22:54:10 UTC