- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:25:14 -0800
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
Dave Singer (iPhone) On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:51, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > On 22/02/2012 2:40 AM, David Singer wrote: >> >> On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:40 , Alan Gresley wrote: >> >>> On 21/02/2012 7:06 AM, David Singer wrote: >>> >>>> I agree, it would be most helpful if they then *evangelized* the CSS >>>> prefix and 'ceased to mention' their old vendor prefixed version. Is >>>> that what you are asking? >>> >>> David. When using Safari 5, iPhone 4 (which I don't have), Chrome 17 or even Firefox 10, I should *not see* a box-shadow in the below test. >> >> I'm sorry, I don't understand what point you are trying to make. Can you explain? >> >> thx > > Once a browser supports a property that is un-prefixed (like box-shadow or border-radius), it should drop support for it’s prefixed counterpart. > > And a whole bunch of pages that used to work, stop working. What's the corresponding benefit? > -- > Alan Gresley > http://css-3d.org/ > http://css-class.com/
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 17:27:04 UTC