- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:46:36 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:18:18 +0100, Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just like authors should expect the 1rem to match be sized to whatever >> the >> default font size should be for that particular user in that particular >> environment for things to be readable, > > Um, I don't. I expect it to be whatever I set on the html element - I > use it to give me much more consistent vertical rhythm without > worrying about inheritance problems. > It's a convenience and > flexibility thing for me, not an accessibility thing (though it's that > too, that's not the main draw). Well, you can do that, but in the process, you discard a potentially useful piece of information: the size of text that the user has indicated works for him as the default size. Anyway, that's besides the point. A new unit that is defined to be the appropriate size of a touch element could be useful, whether you like my parallel with rem or not. - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 15:47:11 UTC