- From: Daniel Tan/BoltClock <lists@NOVALISTIC.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:49:19 +0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 20 Feb, 2012, at 4:25 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > Perhaps the descendant combinator in selectors shouldn't have been > easier to type than all the other combinators. Agreed. I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that it was the only combinator in CSS1 (called a "contextual selector", IIRC). After all, the child and sibling combinators debuted in CSS2, and they weren't even called combinators until the Selectors 3 spec. -- Sent from my iPhone -- Daniel Tan/BoltClock NOVALISTIC • Stellar Software Development & Design <http://NOVALISTIC.com>
Received on Sunday, 19 February 2012 20:49:53 UTC