- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:45:46 -0500
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 11:46:17 UTC
I think you misread what I wrote Daniel, I suggested that you could move a preprocessor into the client and call the seialiazation something else. On Feb 18, 2012 6:23 AM, "Daniel Glazman" < daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 18/02/12 01:16, Brian Kardell a écrit : > > Rather than worry about dramatic changes to CSS to support things that >> actually ARE handled really well by a preprocessor already, why not just >> keep it as a preprocessor? I think its an easier case to make, even to >> > > For at least one good reason: moving the burden to the CLIENT decreases > the burden on the SERVER... > > </Daniel> > >
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 11:46:17 UTC