- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:17:43 +0100
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
David Hyatt wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/#wrap-flow-property > > I'm bothered by the relationship of the wrap-flow property to the > float property. Right now in CSS2.1 we have a very simple exclusion > model, which is float:left and float:right. CSS3 GCPM proposes > adding page floats that can be positioned in the corners of the > page or at the top/bottom of columns. These seem like sensible > additions as well. Yes. > What I don't understand is why we would move from a float-model of > exclusions to a new model that applies to all block-level elements, > even normal flow elements. What is the value of allowing exclusions > to be applied to arbitrary layout schemes? If we instead > implemented precise positioning of floats, e.g., the "positioned > floats" idea, then we could limit exclusions to be applicable only > to floats. Indeed. And, with the GCPM approach, exclusions would be able to describe the most common (if not the simplest) use case: a pull quote positioned between two columns. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0271.html http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#the-float-offset-property -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 22:18:22 UTC