David Hyatt wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/#wrap-flow-property > > I'm bothered by the relationship of the wrap-flow property to the > float property. Right now in CSS2.1 we have a very simple exclusion > model, which is float:left and float:right. CSS3 GCPM proposes > adding page floats that can be positioned in the corners of the > page or at the top/bottom of columns. These seem like sensible > additions as well. Yes. > What I don't understand is why we would move from a float-model of > exclusions to a new model that applies to all block-level elements, > even normal flow elements. What is the value of allowing exclusions > to be applied to arbitrary layout schemes? If we instead > implemented precise positioning of floats, e.g., the "positioned > floats" idea, then we could limit exclusions to be applicable only > to floats. Indeed. And, with the GCPM approach, exclusions would be able to describe the most common (if not the simplest) use case: a pull quote positioned between two columns. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0271.html http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#the-float-offset-property -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Friday, 17 February 2012 22:18:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:11 UTC