- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:21 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 19:40:08 UTC
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > On 2/16/12 1:52 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> The current thinking of the CSSOM editors is that the specification of > >> getPropertyCSSValue() and the CSS*Value types should be segregated from > >> the current draft and placed into a separate module/spec, e.g., "CSSOM > >> Values". It would be useful to hear opinions on this idea. > > > > If we want to get CSSOM to anything like CR in finite time, this is an > > awesome idea. > > If that helps to speed up CSSOM sure. But hopefully there would be > progress on CSSOM Value as well. If it just gets separated to not work on > it anymore, it would be a bad. The main idea is to speed up the process. The editors feel that finalizing the specification text and obtaining closure on baseline CSSOM sans CSS*Value will be easier than if it were included. I would hope that a "CSSOM Values" module could proceed in parallel, possibly with additional editorial resources if they should materialize.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 19:40:08 UTC