- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:22:58 -0800
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 2/16/12 1:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >>> Even if you think getPropertyCSSValue is a terrible API, the idea is great. >> >> The idea of having some sort of objects representing your CSS is ok; >> dunno about great. >> >> The particular object representation present right now is worse than >> nothing. Imo. > > But also because it is undefined. That is what I try to change for at least CSS Transforms. If you want to do it in a greater scope, fine! We should not try to change this solely by looking at Transforms; it needs a more concerted, language-wide effort (which I'm *extremely* interested in doing). We also should not be attempting to innovate in this way within a spec that needs to be stable yesterday. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 19:23:49 UTC