On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> First we should decide if this version of the spec should define any CSS OM stuff, given the in-flux state of CSS OM in general. > > Some CSSOM interfaces are quite stable and more or less interoperably > implemented, such as getComputedStyle(), Element.style, > Element.getBoundingClientRect() Oh, then you should write more tests if you think getBoundingClientRect is implemented interoperable :) Our team is working on it right now, and it definitely isn't for some cases. > , and document.elementFromPoint(). I > think we should definitely continue to define how those interact with > transforms, and the more precision the better. But we shouldn't > include anything that's not precisely defined somewhere. And stop with moving the web forward? I really don't understand you point. You don't want to improve existing interfaces or add new interfaces? -DirkReceived on Thursday, 16 February 2012 19:08:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:12 UTC