- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:36:57 +0800
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
(11/07/14 7:49), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Section 6.2 > ----------- > > * You can do fallback images now simply by using the image() function, > defined in Image Values. There are also many more types of images > than just <url>. I recommend replacing this with just <image>. (If > you'd like to avoid a dependency on Image Values, define <image> to be > equal to <url> for now, with a note that other specs may expand its > definition.) I was having the exact same comment here while doing last call review of the 'icon' property. I hope this comment can be addressed. Also, # Media: all If I am not missing something, this should be "Media: visual" instead. (By the way, the section number changed from 6.2 to 5.2) > Section 10.1.1 > -------------- > * Given that <image>, as defined in Image Values, allows for fallback > images, I suggest dropping the ability to specify multiple images in > the 'cursor' property. This does mean that you can't specify > different x/y coords for different fallbacks, but that doesn't seem > like a big loss; it seems like you'd always just be specifying the > same image in multiple formats. I tend to agree. But dropping this is breaking CSS2.1 compatibility[1] and I don't have data to know if we are able to do so. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/ui.html#cursor-props Cheers, Kenny
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:37:26 UTC