- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:40:28 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, This has been discussed several times already, but I'd like to have another go at it. http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/9 Three browsers / two engines (trident and webkit) support background-position-x and background-position-y, and do so unprefixed. I can be receptive for arguments about not doing this. And to arguments about doing it. But saying it shouldn't be specified and implementing it at the same time makes me a sad panda. While not extremely common, it is not all that rare either in the wild, and our (standard compliant) lack of support for it causes breakage. Outreach to let authors know of their errors has not been very successful on this one, with authors telling us that the fix should be on our side, as they are not under the impression that they are using something out of ordinary. If people against it can convince people shipping it to drop support, I'd be satisfied, as that would force authors to move back to standard compliant ways of doing the same thing. Since I doubt this will happen, I'd like to have it specified. - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 14:41:01 UTC