- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:11:58 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 13, 2012, at 6:17 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/13/2012 03:11 PM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> >> There are multiple implementation, but I don't know if they have >> been tested as interoperably matching the spec. Because there is a chance >> that they are not yet that stable, marking the properties at risk allows >> us to move them to the next level rather if they prove to be less stable >> than gradients, which we do want to unprefix as soon as possible. > > Once the draft is in CR, unprefixing gradients has no dependency on any > other features in the draft. All the at-risk items would go prefix-free at that time too, then. If there are some properties that we think aren't ready for prime time yet, then we should remove them prior to going to CR, so that we can continue to make syntax changes if needed.
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 03:12:28 UTC