- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:35:42 -0800
- To: Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com> wrote: > I like flow over add. I was writing up a response that compared flex-flow to grid-flow... I like the similarity. > > Also note that grid-flow: rows currently means search over all the rows in column 1 looking for a spot, then move to column 2 and search all rows and repeat adding new columns as necessary until we find a free spot to place the grid item. If the name changes so we write grid-auto-add: rows instead, I think the name implies that we will add new rows as necessary so we should be searching columns first. I prefer to define the direction of the flow so +1 for grid-auto-flow. > > The other two property name changes I like. +1 to Phil's reasoning. I like fantasai's names for the sizing properties, and prefer grid-auto-flow since auto positioning doesn't necessarily add rows/columns. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 21:36:29 UTC