- From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:05 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> skreiv Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:11:31 +0100 > dbaron: Are enough things marked as at-risk? > dbaron: Do we have two impls of object-position and image-resolution? > And the rest of object-fit? > fantasai: We have two impls of image-resolution. > florian: We have code for object-* in our tree, but I don't know the > status. […] > dbaron: I suggest we mark everything but gradients as at-risk. I > don't > want any of the other features to hold up gradients. > [several]: That's fine. > RESOLVED: Mark everything in Images 3 as at-risk except gradients. I don't object to marking everything but gradients at risk in order to speed the process. For the record, though: HP and Opera have implemented object-fit and object-position [0]. That is why it was unmarked as at risk. 'scale-down' is still at risk, however. I am uncertain about the status of 'none'. 0. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0076.html -- Leif Arne Storset Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Oslo, Norway
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 13:29:38 UTC