- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:01:58 +0100
- To: "CSS 3 W3C Group" <www-style@w3.org>
That argument seems very weak to me. They are supporting right now a lot of properties both "vendor-prefixed" and "unprefixed" as aliases. They don't have "two" properties at all, they just have one with two names. - Webkit : <prefixed property is just an alias for unprefixed one, the last one win> <div style="border: 30px green solid; -webkit-border-radius: 30px; border-radius: 10px;">abc</div> <div style="border: 30px green solid; border-radius: 10px; -webkit-border-radius: 30px;">abc</div> - Microsoft : <prefixed property is just an alias for unprefixed one, the last one win> <div style="overflow-y: scroll; -ms-overflow-y: visible">abc</div> <div style="-ms-overflow-y: visible; overflow-y: scroll">abc</div> - Mozilla : <prefixed property is just an alias for unprefixed one, the last one win> <div style="border: 30px green solid; -moz-border-radius: 30px; border-radius: 10px;">abc</div> <div style="border: 30px green solid; border-radius: 10px; -moz-border-radius: 30px;">abc</div> - Opera : <?doesn't support aliases?> I did not find a property supported both using -o- and unprefixed, so I can't test, here. Anyway, if they find like having aliases is making the CSS parser slow, this is good, they will try to remove -beta- and -vendor- variant ASAP, which is our goal. -----Message d'origine----- From: Lea Verou Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:36 PM To: François REMY Cc: www-style list Subject: Re: [vendor-prefixes] The system needs to be opt-out, not opt-in On 10/2/12 12:07, François REMY wrote: > * it recognizes both "-beta-property" and > "-vendor-property" as aliases : I was under the impression that such aliases consume extra memory (as they need to be present on every instance) and thus vendors are trying to avoid them. -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 14:02:26 UTC