Something that's been bothering me for a good while now: the section of the Selectors spec which describes the one and only child combinator is titled "Child combinators", in plural (seen in levels 3 and 4). This contrasts with the preceding section, "Descendant combinator", and the next two sections in Selectors 4 for "Adjacent sibling combinator" and "General sibling combinator". (In Selectors 3, these combinators are grouped in a section called "Sibling combinators".) Since there's only one child combinator, just as how there's only one descendant combinator, is the plural "Child combinators" a mistake? Or is there some obscure reason behind it? If it's just a mistake, I apologize for the nitpick ;) -- Daniel Tan/BoltClock NOVALISTIC • Stellar Software Development & Design <http://NOVALISTIC.com>Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 13:28:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC