W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:04:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQvAucV-0m7hNTvxgmGtDu=YeYK7_5n4=xkNHwgiEN+Dk-+uQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Thanks for the fix. What happened to neutral chairing and taking the chair
hat off for stuff like this? The title is a call for action, the chair hat
goes on more firmly than usual but then comes less clearly off before the
actual call for action.

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 11:04:39 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Glazman: "Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?"
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: Vendor Prefixes and Generic Prefixes: who shall use which when and why?"
In reply to: Daniel Glazman: "Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?"
Next in thread: Daniel Glazman: "Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?"
Reply: Daniel Glazman: "Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC