- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:18:59 +0100
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 08/02/2012 19:53, Simon Fraser a écrit : >> I only had two minor issues that were already reported here: >> > >> > 1. e and f in matrix(a,b,c,d,e,f) really are lengths, not unit-less numbers > The WG just resolved today to leave 'e' and 'f' unit-less, for better compatibility with matrix3d() and SVG. Ok. It only remains that section 4 should say explicitly that e and f are in pixels. I think that there is no loss of functionality since matrix(a,b,c,d,E,F) can be written matrix(a,b,c,d,0,0) translate(Epx, Fpx), and the second form can be changed to em or %. >> > 2. The syntax for transform-origin should probably be unified with background-position. > This was the original intention, but addition of the Z parameter for 3D transforms results in ambiguity. This issue needs to be resolved somehow: > <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15432>. How do css3-2d-transforms and css3-3d-transforms interact? I’ll most probably only implement the former. I’ll keep transform-origin parsed as background-position for now and update when this is resolved. Regards, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:19:42 UTC