On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:10 AM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Last time the subject was thrown, by Lea Verou, no major advance was done. > The use cases have been found, a good syntax has been found. Now, we need an > in-depht specification. > > I also had a discussion with Alex Mogilevsky about IFRAME-Content Fallback > and CSS Named Flows. There was a concensus that the HTML working group had > to be involved in the proposal in order to succeed, since defining the > LOADING and ERROR states belongs to HTML, not to CSS. At this time, the > states are defined at some places but are not exposed anywhere in a coherent > way. > > I just sent a mail to www-dom@w3.org to get someone there to react on this > (http://www.w3.org/mid/6A001EBAB6984FC38065AE82EF06647F@FREMYD2). However, I > may have used a wrong mailing list since I'm not used to the HTML side of > the w3c; www-html seems almost dead. You want public-html. www-html is indeed dead. (Ian monitors it for the occasional email, but he monitors a *lot* of places.) ~TJReceived on Friday, 3 February 2012 15:17:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC