Re: "display:transparent" or "display:nobox" (RE: thoughts on page templates)

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:15 AM
>>
>> Ooh, just got a good idea - display:contents
>
> Like

Me too! "display:contents" is nicely consistent with the general
terminology, and seem intuitively understandable.

I also wanted to express support for spec'ing this out. It's
invaluable for several use cases in Web Components. For example, in
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases#Table-based_Charts,
skipping the box of the host element (table) would make things a lot
less awkward for drawing a chart.

:DG<

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 16:44:37 UTC