W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: "display:transparent" or "display:nobox" (RE: thoughts on page templates)

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:44:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky2ot_0xnWYyf33=fqvJx=M=-82iziwzQfdmkt2U+G1srg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:15 AM
>> Ooh, just got a good idea - display:contents
> Like

Me too! "display:contents" is nicely consistent with the general
terminology, and seem intuitively understandable.

I also wanted to express support for spec'ing this out. It's
invaluable for several use cases in Web Components. For example, in
skipping the box of the host element (table) would make things a lot
less awkward for drawing a chart.

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 16:44:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC